The Steelers played the better game and they deserve to be the Super Bowl Champs, and Im not a fan of either team nor do I dislike either team, and infact I like both teams so this is an unbaised approach.
The last play should’ve at least been reviewed so there were no doubts or questions left to ask about it. They may have got the call right even though it feel it was incomplete but why leave any doubts and not verify or make sure your call was correct. The play should’ve at least been reviewed. If it turns out it was incomplete they ruined which could’ve been an exciting hail mary ending, not saying that they would’ve converted it, not to mention the ball wouldve been on about the 36 after that celebration penalty.
Why didnt they review the play? It may’ve been correct but they should’ve at least verified it so there werent any doubts. Whyd they not review it?
The game was already bordering on the ridiculous as it relates to time (four hours).
Take a minute, review it, get the call right. To have the proverbial billion dollars of technology and a small army of officials and review personnel and not review the call (and the league has said they did not review it) just seems bizarre.
Related posts:
- I just wanted to know if anybody agrees with me that the steelers are the best team in the AFC!?
- Ball State game fixed?
- Can A Super Bowl Game Be Protested, No Review On that Play Clearly Incomplete + Steeler Penalty= 29 yrd line?
- Should it have been considered a turnover for the Cardinals last play in the Super Bowl?
- Who thinks that the play in the super bowl was an in-complete pass, not a fumble? I do.?