Should the Jets have lost Super Bowl III?


I’ll probably kill myself for expsoing this, but the COLTS should have WON!!! I feel so dirty.

Watching the game on NFL network the other night and the Jets up 13-7 at midfield early in the 4th quarter they clearly FUMBLED and the Colts recovered!!! Johnny U. was in and he was ripping the Jets defense to shreds. Instead of Colts ball at the 50, the Jets kicked a field goal and basically put the game out of reach. If that fumble had been called a fumble, would the Colts have won 14-13?

How would it have played out with whiners if they had official reviews, Youtube, HDTV, DVDs, internet chat baloney and all the technology of today.

Oh yeah, the Immaculate reception may have been called back, too.

So, has technology helped the game or just destroyed what are commonly referred to as the greatest moments!!!
I guess we now know how the Tuck Rule and Spygate will be looked at 40 years into the future.
"I don’t know where you’re getting your information, but the Jets never led that game 13-7."

That’s true, I guess I was taking out the 3 and adding in the 7 I knew the Colts were getting 10 minutes later.

Many people say this game was fixed. Don’t forget that Namath guaranteed the victory despite the Colts were favorites by 18 points, how was he so sure?.

Related posts:

  1. Kurt Warner’s last play in the Super Bowl.?
  2. My 2008-2009 NFL projections with a short review?
  3. Can A Super Bowl Game Be Protested, No Review On that Play Clearly Incomplete + Steeler Penalty= 29 yrd line?
  4. Can someone help me learn about the Super Bowl?
  5. Who thinks that the play in the super bowl was an in-complete pass, not a fumble? I do.?